Tokio Async in Rust: tokio::join! vs tokio::spawn()
Rust’s Tokio async runtime provides two common ways to execute multiple async tasks concurrently: tokio::join!
and tokio::spawn()
. Choosing the right one is crucial for efficiency and proper task management. In this article, we’ll break down their differences, advantages, and when to use each with examples.
Understanding tokio::join!
tokio::join!
is used when you need structured concurrency—where all async tasks must complete together before moving on.
How It Works
- Executes multiple futures concurrently in the same parent task.
- If one task blocks, all other tasks wait.
- Returns all results at once.
Example Usage
use tokio::join;
async fn task1() -> String {
"Task 1 completed".to_string()
}
async fn task2() -> String {
"Task 2 completed".to_string()
}
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let (res1, res2) = join!(task1(), task2());
println!("{}\n{}", res1, res2);
}
✅ Use case: When all tasks must complete before proceeding.
Understanding tokio::spawn()
tokio::spawn()
runs each async function in a separate Tokio task, meaning they execute independently.
How It Works
- Tasks run truly in parallel on Tokio’s scheduler.
- If one task hangs or panics, others continue running.
- Returns a
JoinHandle<T>
, which you must.await
.
Example Usage
use reqwest::Client;
use tokio::task::JoinHandle;
const URLS: [&str; 3] = [
"https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1",
"https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/2",
"https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/3",
];
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let client = Client::new();
let handles: Vec<JoinHandle<()>> = URLS.iter()
.map(|&url| {
let client = client.clone();
tokio::spawn(async move {
if let Err(e) = fetch_url(&client, url).await {
eprintln!("Error fetching {}: {:?}", url, e);
}
})
})
.collect();
for handle in handles {
let _ = handle.await; // Ensure all tasks finish
}
}
async fn fetch_url(client: &Client, url: &str) -> Result<(), reqwest::Error> {
let res = client.get(url).send().await?;
let content = res.text().await?;
println!("{:?}", content);
Ok(())
}
✅ Use case: When tasks should run independently and in the background.
Comparison: tokio::join!
vs tokio::spawn()
Feature | tokio::join! | tokio::spawn() |
---|---|---|
Task Execution | Runs in the same parent task | Runs in separate Tokio tasks |
Blocking Behavior | If one task hangs, all are delayed | If one task hangs, others continue |
Error Handling | If one task panics, all are aborted | If one task panics, others keep running |
Return Values | Returns all task results | Returns a JoinHandle<T> that you must .await |
Overhead | Slightly lower (same task) | Slightly higher (separate tasks) |
Use Case | When all tasks must complete together | When tasks should run independently |
Which One Should You Use?
- ✅ Use
tokio::join!
when:- You need all tasks to finish together before moving forward.
- Your tasks depend on each other.
- Example: Fetch multiple API responses, then process them together.
- ✅ Use
tokio::spawn()
when:- Each task should run independently.
- A task may take longer, but others shouldn’t wait.
- Example: Handling multiple user requests in a web server.
Final Thoughts
Both tokio::join!
and tokio::spawn()
have their strengths. Your choice depends on whether tasks should complete together (join!
) or run independently (spawn()
). Understanding their differences will help you write more efficient and scalable Rust async applications.

tokio::join!
and tokio::spawn()